You know what my doubt is about the whole "blade doesn't matter" is? That, i 've read several experienced wet shavers while googling and they are divided. There are those that say "blade doesn't matter". There are those who say "blade doesn't matter, except 3-4 which i can't stand" and there are those who say "blade does matter, YMMV". Oh, and there are those who say "blade doesn't matter, only technique does and this includes prep".
Starting from the last one, i immediately discard that, because for me, prep isn't part of a technique. It's part of a "chemical attack" against the whiskers, so that even the worst blade can cut them. That's not technique, it's chemistry.
Then you have the rest of opinions. Which brings several questions:
1) What is at the end this technique and why some can have this "universal technique", while others, despite years in wet shaving, still believe that blades make difference? Are there specific instructions other than 30 deg angle and no pressure?
2) Is this technique universal and works with any blade or must you use different technique for different blade?
3) Since a person has at some point a certain technique, bad or good, if the results vary with blades, then blade does make a difference, at least, if you don't have an excellent technique.
4) How easy is to develop "excellent technique"? Because, one can drive for 30 years and be a good driver, but he won't be as good as a Formula 1 driver.
To me, the ultimate proof, would be very simple. Eliminate observer bias. It would be to gather some commonly acclaimed wet shavers, give them same razor and start changing blades, without informing them which blade they use (blind trial). And then, have them do the traditional 3 passes, but without repass. 3 passes. At the end, some judges, who also don't know the blades used (double blind trial), should assess the results (BBS, DFS etc). If technique equalizes the blades, they should all get BBS no matter the blade. If not, the blade matters. That's how you test drug efficacy vs placebo, so it's as objective as it gets. But, i understand that this would be very complicated...
Click to expand...