Most of this thread has been pretty "tongue in cheek", but that was actually a very interesting post. Thanks for passing it on
@Linuxguile. I'd never thought about things from a brushmaker's perspective. I had been coming at it from my perspective in the food industry, which is a bit different.
As a food manufacturer, I have a lot of experience and understanding about the biology and chemistry of water, oils, and microbial growth, so my automatic thought is that water is a rich medium in which to quickly and efficiently grow nasties (bacteria, pathogens, mold, etc.). Despite most people's misconception that "water is clean", it's typically not. Although it can be made clean by proper treatment, filtration, and storage in a sanitary environment (preferably stored in a closed sanitary environment with a vacuum seal), the second it starts interacting with air and the physical environment around it, it immediately starts accumulating, growing and incubating things that you don't want on and in your body. I have an entire lab in our plant that seeks to reduce, eliminate, and monitor the impact of water in our operation because of this (as do most reputable food manufacturers in the US). Accordingly adding it to anything you plan to keep in ambient temperature storage in a closed container is almost always a bad idea.
Given both perspectives, I'd agree with Doug's statement above when he said,
"I'm just trying to point out that every method entails some degree of compromise". Good point. Is the risk of nasties breeding in your soap tub enough not to souse greater than the risk of prematurely wearing out your brush? Let's be honest, if you are as OCD as most of us are, neither is likely to happen, so this is really a non issue either way. If you are using a good soap and a good brush, and not leaving water on the puck when you put it up, and not jamming the brush into the soap like a retarded monkey, neither of these actually poses a significant (or potentially even a real) risk. (Besides, I've seen you guys' dens; if someone were actually to prematurely wear out a brush, you'd have to revert to using your other 20 brushes while you gleefully anticipate the arrival of a new brush to take the place of the old one. Really, who are we kidding here?)
So, then, what is my conclusion? What it comes down to for me, is I'm a boxers guy. Not briefs, and certainly not bloomers. As I said on another thread, guys who call themselves "bloomers" need to stop using limp a wrist when whipping up lather and they'd have better results. Having said that, given all the feedback here, I may consider an occasional souse just to keep things interesting. It is MAYhem after all...
In summary:
1. Boxers > Bloomers
2. Star Wars > Star Trek
3. Zeppelin > Rolling Stones
4. Tesla > Edison (research it; this is relatively indisputable)
5. Dogs > Cats
Click to expand...