Let me try and explain without going to deep and sounding like an A$$
Natural hones don't have Grit Ratings, the comparisons people tend to use are about useless, worse people that sell them just make up higher and higher ratings because there can be no proof
You can rate the cutting grit in a natural stone sometimes but it doesn't really tell you much because that grit isn't uniform, like a Coticule the tiny Garnets are right around 3~micron or 8000 but they don't act like a grid sifted 8ooo SiC hone so the comparison ends there
You have Japanese naturals that the grit is probably around that same level when measured IN the stone, but once released and worked the binder and the grit begin to cleave and become something different..
This Slate is much the same I have tested quite a few slates over the years, this is definitely a Finisher, the feed back from my customers that have tried the edge have ranged from Very Nice Edge to OMG you just shook my world..
The problem is we never know what the next slate will bring, he might try another table and get something much less
This is the exact problem with many of the Slates out there, they are all over the place, ILR comes to mind, I have tested 6-7 of them over the years and no two are alike some are just not finisher grade..
This batch of 9-Ball slate as I call mine, is good, and I can recommend it
I am just now testing the HG slate, my first shave with one of my razors is here in a bit, from there I will send out a few edges to customers that are familiar with my edges so they can give feedback if my test shave went well
I am pretty picky as to what I send out, because my edges are Guaranteed, if I send one and they don't like that edge, I am obligated to re-hone for free
Anyway I hope that answered your questions as to how I rate them
"Finisher to be used" or "Goes in the bottom of the hone chest to get dusty" LOL
Click to expand...