First off, welcome back . . . I think.
Now to address some of your points
1. The motion was timely filed and, even if it was not, there was no objection filed to its consideration. As a result, you are without jurisdiction to contest the consideration of the argument.
2.

You are correct, so I guess that gets you points for paying attention but not in the final decision.
3. Sometimes bad shaves happen, which also mean sometimes bad passes happen. So,
ipso facto, it is "possible" (which was the word I used) the angle was off. It was not conceded as fact, but only acknowledged as a possibility.
4-6. @
Bama Samurai filed his motion to reconsider, and the case was reconsidered. The final outcome is still in question. When considering apples to apples and not cigars to pipes, the settings have run pretty even . . . so far.
Now as for my shaves Saturday and Sunday. You are conceding that your settings are not sufficient to provide for a full day's quality shave. That will be considered when a final opinion is drafted. Instead of being honored that I entrusted that shave to your settings, you instead try and manipulate the facts to maintain the shave was unfair. Well, lets set the record straight . . .
Since you like bullet points I will do the same again here.
1. Both the Saturday and Sunday shaves occurred in the morning as it was the only time available to shave with all the activities planned. So both shaves occurred in the morning.
2. Saturday's shave had 2 days growth and Sunday's had 1 day growth.
3. Both shaves had "magnitude of the event" consideration as both evenings consisted of dinners and evening festivities.
4. Both shaves were considered immediately after shaving and several hours later by my fiancee and the Saturday shave just did not meet her expectations. As a result, when major events occur in the future, I may have to go with Chris's settings, especially in light of the concession above.
Your counterproductive whining

will be construed as your motion to reconsider, and it is denied.
I do wish to edify you regarding my role. I am not your advocate (your bribe was not nearly good enough for me to assume that role). I am the neutral and impartial judge in this proceeding. Keep up the complaining and I may send Igor your way to explain the difference to you. You will only wish for

Finally, threatening the welfare of a judge is a federal offense. The FBI (Federation of Boris and Ivan) will be stopping by for, well, let's just call it an interrogation.

Chris may win this by default because his opponent may have to withdraw based on exceptional circumstances.
Good luck!

Click to expand...