Proraso - how many grams in the 150 ml tube?

Discussion in 'Shave Creams' started by danbuter, Jul 22, 2016.

  1. danbuter

    danbuter Well-Known Member

    Pretty much every other cream and soap uses grams for weight. The Proraso tubes are in ml, specifically 150. Anyone know about how many grams this would be?

    I'm assuming it's not 1:1 like water is.
     
  2. swarden43

    swarden43 "It's your shave. Enjoy it your way."©

    Sorry, no idea, but welcome to the Den.
     
  3. Queen of Blades

    Queen of Blades Mistress of Mischief Staff Member

    Moderator Supporting Vendor
    Musgo Real uses ml (plus ounces) on their packages.

    I have a feeling it has to do with filling tubes versus bowls/tubs.

    As for the conversion, I have found it to be pretty much 1:1 in my 9 years of filling shaving cream samples.
     
    Straight razor dandy likes this.
  4. Omelmad

    Omelmad My printer email address is..........

    I saw on badger and blade someone typed 107 grams
     
  5. DaltonGang

    DaltonGang Ol' Itchy Whiskers

    The answer is 150. 1:1 ratio.
     
  6. jimjo1031

    jimjo1031 never bloomed myself

    agree with DaltonGang, it's 1:1. ml is volume, grams is weight
     
    Primotenore likes this.
  7. Mr. Shaverman

    Mr. Shaverman Well-Known Member

    Grams are for weight, milliliters are for liquid volume. The two aren't equal. For instance:

    150 grams of gold will not fill a 150ml container.

    However, as we're not talking gold and we're talking liquid shave cream which is water based, they are very much rough equivalents.
     
    jimjo1031 likes this.
  8. jimjo1031

    jimjo1031 never bloomed myself

    true I agree, but measurement charts show 1ml of water weighs 1gr. it's confusing, but I guess that's the standard of measurement.
     
    Mr. Shaverman likes this.
  9. Mr. Shaverman

    Mr. Shaverman Well-Known Member

    Charts show that because it is true for water, that's what the baseline is for both. So anything that's water based, like shave cream, is going to pretty much equal. It's just when you step away from water based things does it stop to make sense.
     
    jimjo1031 likes this.
  10. The Sandman

    The Sandman New Member

    If it's of any help, my tube of Proraso Blue say 147 grams on the back.
     
  11. drone115b

    drone115b Active Member

    Yes. My tube of Proraso Red also says 150ml, 5.2 oz, 147 gram.
     
  12. Primotenore

    Primotenore missed opera tunity

    Article Team
    1:1 for water is correct.
     
  13. Bama Samurai

    Bama Samurai with Laser-like Focus

    Part of the confusion is that gram is a measurement of mass and not weight. Oddly, in the US we use pounds/force for "weighing things". Weight and mass are not the same thing, exactly. Weight is the force of gravity acting upon a given mass. Mass is the amount of matter contained in an object. Water was used as the standard for mass of 1ml because water has a fairly stable density/noncompressibility profile as a liquid and is ubiquitous on earth.
     
  14. Primotenore

    Primotenore missed opera tunity

    Article Team
    Good description. 1 Liter of water weighs 1 Kilogram, etc.
    I personally find the pounds history more romantic, albeit more confusing, than the metric system.
     
  15. Bama Samurai

    Bama Samurai with Laser-like Focus

    One liter of water has a mass of one kilogram. Weight is dependent upon location in the universe.
     
    Primotenore likes this.
  16. Primotenore

    Primotenore missed opera tunity

    Article Team
    Ok
    How about here on earth?
     
  17. Bama Samurai

    Bama Samurai with Laser-like Focus

    The confusion arises in everyday speech. People say "weight" and "mass" imprecisely and interchangeably.

    Here's a link that explains it better. Mass never changes. Weight is dependent upon the force of gravity, which is variable, even on earth. Scroll through for the physics explanation.

    http://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/weight/

    This article shows a map of relative gravity here on Earth.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ty-field-revealed-extraordinary-map-time.html
     
    Paul Turner and Primotenore like this.

Share This Page