Long Handled brushes.....why not?

Discussion in 'The Brush' started by Stubble, Mar 27, 2007.

  1. moses

    moses New Member

    Sounds ideal. Too bad it is SO VERY UGLY.

    -Mo
     
  2. Stauff

    Stauff Inspeicktor

    As the members of Bauhaus would say: Function determines form. ;)
     
  3. moses

    moses New Member

    Indeed. But look at the PJ shaped long handles. Floris, or the Shavemacs. Even the PJ itself. Just as much function, without any of the ugly....

    -Mo
     
  4. Stauff

    Stauff Inspeicktor

    I agree. The PJ is so gorgeous I could kiss it.
     
  5. Smedley

    Smedley New Member

    It's barely noon on Sunday and I haven't had a second cup of Aeropress coffee yet. PJ? Vas ist das?
     
  6. xChris

    xChris Member

    PJ = Persian Jar
     
  7. Stauff

    Stauff Inspeicktor

    In Praise of the Polo handle!

    The Persian Jar is definately more beautiful than the Polo, but still I believe the latter to be the better brush. There actually IS a functional difference between the two handles: the polo handle is slightly top-heavy, which makes for an easier whipping action in the bowl. The PJ is lighter and more balanced, but it isn't the ultimate lather whipping tool my polo is. Plus, a polo is denser and has a shorter loft, which makes it equally good for use with creams AND soaps. The PJ is more of a cream brush IMO.

    For an allround, superior quality shaving brush, The Simpson polo 8 best is hard to beat IMHO.
     

Share This Page